Judge rejects B.C. government’s bid to drop case against COVID-19 vaccine orders


A B.C. court judge has rejected the provincial government’s bid to have a case against its COVID-19 vaccine orders for health-care workers thrown out.

In a Wednesday decision, Justice Simon Coval dismissed the provincial health officer’s argument that the petitioners lack legal standing in the matter, finding instead they have a “public interest standing.”

The petition, which seeks to quash the double-immunization orders, is a “reasonable” way to bring forward important health-care issues that “transcend the interests of those directly involved,” he wrote.

Read more:

Petition calls for mandatory COVID-19 vaccines at Whistler Blackcomb resort

Last October, Dr. Bonnie Henry ordered staff in the bulk of health-care settings — including hospitals, long-term care homes and clinics — be fully-vaccinated to work on-site.

Story continues below advertisement

The non-profit Canadian Society for the Advancement of Science in Public Policy (CSASPP) argues the mandate is unconstitutional, and fails to accommodate people with religious objections, vaccination risks, immunity from prior infection, and a recent, negative COVID-19 test result.

It requested a reconsideration of the orders in November, presenting a suite of safety alternatives and examples of jurisdictions with less restrictive approaches. The provincial health officer refused, however, claiming it sought exemptions on non-medical grounds.

Click to play video: 'COVID-19: Vaccine card no longer in place in B.C.'

COVID-19: Vaccine card no longer in place in B.C.

COVID-19: Vaccine card no longer in place in B.C – Apr 8, 2022

Henry’s lawyers argued the CSASPP’s petition does not present a serious issue to the court as it contains “no adjudicative facts.” The advocacy group, they claimed, is a “purpose-built anti-COVID-19 measures entity,” and it has no history of involved in the issues identified in its petition.

The CSASPP claims an estimated 41 of its 170 members work in a health-care setting.

Story continues below advertisement

In his decision, Coval found the group satisfied “genuine interest” and engagement tests in the matter, evidenced primarily through the work it put into its November reconsideration request. The less intrusive safety measures it presented in that request raise “substantial questions” that are “clearly not frivolous,” he wrote.

© 2022 Global News, a division of Corus Entertainment Inc.

Read original article here

Denial of responsibility! Verve Times is an automatic aggregator of the all world’s media. In each content, the hyperlink to the primary source is specified. All trademarks belong to their rightful owners, all materials to their authors. If you are the owner of the content and do not want us to publish your materials, please contact us by email – [email protected]. The content will be deleted within 24 hours.

Leave a comment