Elephant tweets highlight divide on conservation issues

0

Elephant. Credit: Picture by Yathin S Krishnappa. Licensed under CCBY-SA3.0

An analysis of social media posts has highlighted how attention on Twitter does not align with the most pressing threats to wild elephants, which may have negative consequences for elephant conservation and lead to resentment from local communities that live with elephants.

The research, led by Griffith University, acknowledged social media as a growing news source for sharing conservation information, but that there have been few studies which have examined the impact of social media on wildlife conservation.

To address this oversight, Ph.D. Candidate Niall Hammond from the Centre for Planetary Health and Food Security used elephants as a test species to conduct a content analysis of tweets posted about elephants during 2019.

According to the global conservation authority, the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN), the most pressing threats to the conservation of wild elephant populations are habitat loss, human-elephant conflict, and poaching, with the magnitude of each threat differing between the three species of elephant (African Forest Elephant, African Savanna Elephant, and Asian Elephant).

“The key highlights were that of the three main threats to wild elephants—being poaching, habitat loss, and human-elephant conflict—there was a lack of attention on Twitter specifically around habitat loss and human-elephant conflict,” Hammond said.

“Our Twitter analysis revealed these major threats were infrequently discussed, with habitat loss being the most infrequently discussed (

Among the other findings:

  • Elephant welfare issues, such as tourist elephant rides, were the most frequently discussed topic (23%);
  • Users from non-elephant range countries were the dominant voice on Twitter (72% of tweets with an identifiable location), with these tweets likely to discuss elephant welfare concerns and trophy hunting, which is not a threat to elephant conservation;
  • Conversely, tweets from users from African elephant range countries (14%) were more likely to discuss human-elephant conflict, poaching, and promote elephant tourism;
  • Similarly, users from Asian elephant range countries (13%) were likely to discuss human-elephant conflict and elephant tourism but unlikely to tweet about poaching.

The findings also identified that the location of the tweets’ origins highlighted a divide in the understanding and lived experiences of those who resided in countries with elephants and those without.

“We could see that Twitter users from, for example, Botswana took issue with particularly people in North America and Europe criticizing how their countries and regions decided to manage their own wildlife,” Hammond said.

“When we watch nature documentaries, elephants are often portrayed as living in areas where there are no people, but that is not the reality.”

“The reality is that in many areas, elephants and people live in shared spaces, where there are no fences to separate people and wildlife. Communities in these areas make great sacrifices for elephants, in some cases going as far as to self-impose curfews at night due to the presence of elephants or farmers sleeping in their fields to protect their crops from elephants.”

“This is subsistence farming a lot of the time where people are just getting by, so if an elephant does come into their field, their whole livelihood could be gone.”

“It is important to acknowledge the sacrifices these communities make on a daily basis in co-existing with elephants and advocate for greater rights for communities to manage their wildlife sustainably because without their continued support the conservation of elephants would not be possible.”

Hammond said given the relatively low representation of local stakeholders and the limited coverage of key conservation threats, there is a need to ensure that social media discussions do not overly influence decision-makers.

The research has been published in Conservation Science and Practice.


Sumatran elephant found beheaded in Indonesia


More information:
Niall L. Hammond et al, Examining attention given to threats to elephant conservation on social media, Conservation Science and Practice (2022). DOI: 10.1111/csp2.12785

Provided by
Griffith University


Citation:
Elephant tweets highlight divide on conservation issues (2022, August 12)
retrieved 12 August 2022
from https://phys.org/news/2022-08-elephant-tweets-highlight-issues.html

This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no
part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.

Read original article here

Denial of responsibility! Verve Times is an automatic aggregator of the all world’s media. In each content, the hyperlink to the primary source is specified. All trademarks belong to their rightful owners, all materials to their authors. If you are the owner of the content and do not want us to publish your materials, please contact us by email – [email protected]. The content will be deleted within 24 hours.

Leave a comment
Hello,